Quick answer

On the standard scale (mean 100, SD 15) an IQ of 140 is reached by about 0.4% of people, or 1 in 260. An IQ of 145 is roughly 1 in 740, 150 is 1 in 2,300, and 160 is 1 in 31,000. Above about 145 the numbers come from the shape of the normal curve rather than from real test takers, so treat them as estimates, not head counts.

The rarity of each score

IQShare of people at or aboveAbout 1 in…Common label
1302.3%44Very superior / gifted
1351.0%102Gifted
1400.38%261Gifted / “genius” in old tables
1450.13%741Highly gifted
1500.043%2,330Highly gifted
1550.012%8,137Exceptionally gifted
1600.0032%31,560Exceptionally gifted

In a city of one million adults, that works out to roughly 3,800 people at 140 or above, 1,350 at 145 or above, and about 30 at 160 or above. The full table for every score is in our IQ percentile chart.

Where the number 140 comes from

The “140 = genius” idea dates to Lewis Terman’s 1916 Stanford-Binet manual, which labelled scores of 140 and up “genius or near genius”. The label was dropped decades ago; modern manuals stop at “very superior” or “extremely high”, and gifted-education programmes typically use 130 (the top 2%) as the entry line. Nothing changes at exactly 140 except the word people attach to it.

A more useful way to think about 140 is in standard deviations: it is 2.67 SD above the mean. At that distance, a test with a reliability of 0.95 still has a standard error of about 3.4 points, so the honest statement is “somewhere between the mid-130s and the mid-140s”.

Why scores above 145 are estimates

Norm samples are finite. A test standardised on 2,000 people contains, on average, only three people at 145 or above and almost certainly nobody at 160. Publishers extend the top of the scale by assuming the normal curve continues, which is reasonable but unverified. Real distributions also have slightly heavier tails than the pure normal curve, so the true share at 160+ is probably a little higher than 1 in 31,000. Either way, a test cannot distinguish 155 from 165 with any confidence: at that level, ceiling effects (running out of hard questions) dominate.

This is also why claims of IQs of 200 or more in biographies are not measurements in the modern sense. They come from the old ratio formula (mental age divided by chronological age), which produces huge numbers for precocious children and has no meaning for adults. The history is in what mental age really is.

Can an online test tell you whether you are at 140?

A well-built online test can place you in the right region: top 10%, top 2%, or above. What it cannot do is resolve the difference between 138 and 143, because that needs many very hard, well-calibrated items and a supervised setting. Our Mensa-style practice test is designed for the top end (35 matrix puzzles, 25 minutes) and tells you whether you cross the top-2% line; the 45-question full test gives the narrowest confidence interval of our free tests. For a formal number that an institution will accept, a psychologist-administered WAIS or Stanford-Binet is the route.

Frequently asked questions

Is an IQ of 140 considered genius?

Only in Terman’s 1916 classification. Modern tests do not use the word; 140 is simply the 99.6th percentile, or about 1 in 260 people.

How many people in the world have an IQ over 160?

Using the normal curve and a world adult population of about 5.8 billion, roughly 180,000. The real number is uncertain because no test is normed that high.

What is the highest IQ possible?

Most modern tests stop reporting at 160 (some at 175) because there are not enough people in the norm sample to measure beyond it. Higher figures you see quoted come from old ratio formulas or extrapolation.

Does Mensa require an IQ of 140?

No. Mensa admits the top 2%, which is an IQ of about 131–132 on an SD 15 scale (148 on the old Cattell SD 24 scale). See our guide to Mensa requirements.

Are you in the top 2%?

The Mensa-style practice test checks it with 35 matrix puzzles in 25 minutes. Free, no sign-up.

Take the Mensa-Style Test